Connecticut Superior Court, 1998

Shaham v. Wheeler, No. Cv95 0321879s (Apr. 16, 1998)

Shaham v. Wheeler, No. Cv95 0321879s (Apr. 16, 1998)
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided April 16, 1998 · GROGINS, J.
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 5126
Shaham v. Wheeler, No. Cv95 0321879s (Apr. 16, 1998)

Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION FOR REARGUEMENT (#161) ONDEFENDANTS' CASSAVECHIA AND BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC. MOTION TOSTRIKE AND MOTION FOR JUDGMENT Practice Book § 4002B, now Practice Book (1998 Rev.) § 61-3, expressly provides for appeal from judgment disposing of part of a complaint where that judgment disposes of all causes of action in the complaint brought against a particular party. Further, this section provides that "[s]uch judgment shall be a final judgment regardless of whether judgment was rendered on the granting of a motion to strike pursuant to [Practice Book § 157, now Practice Book (1998 Rev.) § 10-44], by dismissal pursuant to [Practice Book § 142, now Practice Book (1998 Rev.) § 10-30], by summary judgment pursuant to [Practice Book § 379, now Practice Book (1998 Rev.) § 17-44], or otherwise." Therefore, it is clear that judgment may be rendered pursuant to Practice Book § 157, now Practice Book (1998 Rev.) § 10-44, if the plaintiff fails to file a new pleading within fifteen days of the granting of a motion to strike all causes of action against a particular party or parties.

For the aforementioned reasons, plaintiff's notice of intent to reargue and request for argument is denied. Also, plaintiff's motion to open judgment is denied.

Grogins, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.