Livingston v. Warden, No. Cv98-0583299 (Dec. 22, 1998)
Opinion of the Court
Dr. Edward Blanchette, medical director for the Department of Correction, testified that a review of the petitioner's medical history and treatment dates back to 1993 while incarcerated and that despite the petitioner's denial these same complaints were made then resulting in a series of tests at St. Francis Hospital in 1994 including an echocardiogram, stress test and a head CAT scan. He was discharged with a psychiatric condition, not a cardiac one. The records evidence a pattern by the petitioner of a failure to eat properly resulting in hypoglycemic episodes. The latter part of March, 1996, after being released from incarceration he went for emergency services at the Veterans Memorial Medical Center in Meriden on a complaint of chest pains and weakness. He was evaluated after various tests were performed with no objective findings of a cardiac condition. After his CT Page 15499 readmission to the Department of Corrections on a mittimus issued October 29, 1997 the petitioner has established the same pattern. Because of his improper eating habits he has had several hypoglycemic episodes which result from low sugar causing headaches, an irregular heartbeat and loss of consciousness. Dr. Blanchette was of the opinion that he needs a psychiatric evaluation which he has refused.
He testified that Dr. Silvers requested an echocardiogram but has found nothing objective and he has no intention to give a stress test or monitor. The petitioner has been seen by Dr. Bianchi at Carl Robinson Reception Center on December 9 and 10, 1998 and has found no abnormalities to the heart.
The petitioner returned in rebuttal to deny that he ever was a patient at Veterans Memorial Hospital and denies any need for a mental health evaluation. He has no anxiety which the medical staff find when they fail to find the causes of his cardiac condition. He admits that he is turned off by the food available to him.
Dr. Blanchette in surrebuttal testified that the petitioner himself was the one who referred to his tests at the Veterans Memorial Hospital and that was the reason for sending for his medical records from the hospital which were then introduced as an exhibit (Respondent's Exhibit A). The exhibit corroborates Dr. Blanchette's observation that tests done produced no objective findings of a cardiac condition.
The court finds that the petitioner has received adequate medical treatment and he, himself, has caused his continuing problems by refusing to follow medical advice. He is not free to prescribe a treatment for himself when the prescribed treatment available is in accordance with applicable medical standards.McCloud v. Delaney,
For the above reasons the petition is denied.
Corrigan, JTR
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.