Connecticut Superior Court, 1998

Kittle v. Kittle, No. Fa88-0351764s (Sep. 24, 1998)

Kittle v. Kittle, No. Fa88-0351764s (Sep. 24, 1998)
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided September 24, 1998 · DRANGINIS, JUDGE
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 11813
Kittle v. Kittle, No. Fa88-0351764s (Sep. 24, 1998)

Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

ORDER CT Page 11814
Motion to Reopen and Modify Judgment is denied.

The judgment calls for alimony for a non-modifiable term and amount. The Stipulation for Judgment and Judgment contain no language which alludes to the termination of alimony upon the death, remarriage or cohabitation of the wife. The plain language of the parties' contract controls. Willis v. Willis, 14 CLT (9/26/88). Rau v. Rau, 37 Conn. App. 209, 211 (1995); Sheehanv. Balasic, 46 Conn. App. 327 (1997), cert. granted, 243 Conn. 945 (11/6/97). The language of the parties' agreement and the judgment of the court is unambiguous.

Anne C. Dranginis Judge, Superior Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.