Fortney v. Fortney, No. Fa 98-0116310 S (Dec. 3, 1998)

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MOTION TO DISMISS, PENDENTE LITE CT Page 2056 The plaintiff, Bertha M. Fortney, hereby respectfully moves this court for an order dismissing this action pursuant to Practice Book § 10-30 et seq. and § 25-12 et seq. for the reasons set forth in more detail in the plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss and the Affidavit of Bertha M. Fortney. In the alternative, this matter should be transferred to the Judicial District of Stamford/Norwalk at Stamford.

ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED. TESTIMONY NOT REQUIRED.

Respectfully submitted.

THE PLAINTIFF BY SCHOONMAKER, GEORGE COLIN, P.C. JURIS NO. 412222 HER ATTORNEYS

By Samuel V. Schoonmaker III Samuel V. Schoonmaker IV 5 Edgewood Avenue P.O. Box 5059 Greenwich, CT 06831-5059

ORDER

The foregoing Motion to Dismiss, Pendente Lite having been heard, it is hereby GRANTED in part; denied in part.

It is further ordered that:

1. This matter is transferred to the Judicial District of Fairfield.

BY THE COURT

Solomon, Judge

CERTIFICATIONI hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Motion to CT Page 2057 Dismiss, pendente Lite has been mailed, postage prepaid this 1st of December, 1998, to:

Melvin Scott, Esq. Scott Scott, LLC 108 Norwich Avenue P.O. Box 192 Colchester, CT 06415

SCHOONMAKER, GEORGE COLIN, P.C.

By Samuel V. Schoonmaker IV

CT Page 2004