Russo v. Hospital of St. Raphael, No. Cv 97-0406731 S (May 12, 1998)
Opinion of the Court
This court adopts the reasoning in the cases cited by the defendant. See Audie v. Hospital of ST. Raphael, No. CV 9500522325, 1997 WL 176285 (Conn. Superior Court April, 1997);Price v. Castro, No. CV 94 0542538S, 1997 WL 596670 (Conn. Superior Court. Sept. 16, 1997); Stowe v. McHugh, No. 0117721. 1995 WL 27210 (Conn. Superior Court Jan. 17, 1995)
An apportionment complaint does not seek to recover damages. Conn. General Statutes § 52-19Oa therefore, does not apply.
The defendant's objection to the plaintiff's Motion to Strike is sustained.
Thomas V. O'Keefe Judge of the Superior Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.