Dahill Company v. Fico, No. Cv 98 040 81 94 S (Mar. 2, 1999)
Opinion of the Court
The work was done pursuant to a written contract for $2,050.00, plus $114.00 tax. The contract also provides for finance charges and costs of collection, including attorney's fees.
The defendant has filed a counterclaim and setoff, alleging the expenditure of sums to repair the allegedly defective work.
The plaintiff offered testimony in rebuttal to the effect that the cupola area could be leaking from causes other than the repaired flashing.
The defendant offered no corroboration of his testimony and admitted that he had not made any additional repairs or spent any other sums.
Judgment may enter for the plaintiff on the first count. The second count in implied contract is inappropriate, the third count alleging unjust enrichment is superfluous, and there is no evidence to support the fourth count sounding in CUTPA. These counts are dismissed.
The plaintiff's request for attorney's fees in the amount of $1,042.50 is reasonable and an award of legal interest for $595.32 is also made.
Judgment is therefore entered in the amount of $3,801.82 representing:
contract price and tax $2,164.00 legal interest 595.32 Attorney's fees 1,042.50 total $3,801.82
Anthony V. DeMayo Judge Trial Referee
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.