State v. Richardson, No. 485220 (May 18, 1999)
Opinion of the Court
Kevin Randolph, Attorney at Law, for the Defendant, Lucis Richardson.
Donna Mainville, Senior Court Monitor.
MOTION TO SUPPRESS
But, in any event, it's clear to the Court — the Court believes clearly beyond a preponderance of evidence that when he was brought to the police station — he was brought to the police station around five o'clock by the officers. The manner brought by the officers, the Court, logical and reasonable — and even the quantity versus the quality, even if I say his way is just as every bit as good, the way the police officers conducted and the logical and reasonable conclusion is they believed him. They let him go. They went another couple of days before he was arrested. His statements of the 24th led them to Robin. And, as they testified, it was only once he told them about Robin that they found out that Robin was saying that he did it. It just all naturally flows. Outside of the four state witnesses opposed to — if I put them on the exact same level and said I believe both, what corroboration do I have? The statement, and the statement of the 29th at the 101 Lafayette Street.
Honorable Kevin P. McMahon, Judge
Dated this 18th day of May, 1999, in Hartford, Connecticut.
Donna Mainville, Court Monitor
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.