People's Bank v. Letendre, No. Cv 98 66468 S (Aug. 24, 1999)
People's Bank v. Letendre, No. Cv 98 66468 S (Aug. 24, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 11785
Opinion of the Court
If the plaintiffs motion were to be granted, the defendant would be sued on the note by the plaintiff and hence suffer a second litigation. Such a second litigation could result in exposure to greater damages on the part of the defendant.
The plaintiff has chosen his remedy by bringing an action in foreclosure, to now allow the plaintiff to change remedies after judgment has entered would be unfair and inequitable.
Accordingly, the Motion to Reopen Judgment is denied.
Stengel, J.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.