Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Connecticut Superior Court, 1999

Resis v. Huntleigh Corp., No. Cv 48 63 52 (Jan. 19, 1999)

Resis v. Huntleigh Corp., No. Cv 48 63 52 (Jan. 19, 1999)
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided January 19, 1999 · SKOLNICK, JUDGE.
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 340
Resis v. Huntleigh Corp., No. Cv 48 63 52 (Jan. 19, 1999)

Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION CROSS CLAIM DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE THE CROSS CLAIM PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM FOR INDEMNIFICATION/CONTRIBUTION (#112)
Any right of contribution the cross claim plaintiff in this product liability action has against the cross claim defendant must exist pursuant to General Statutes § 52-572o(e). SeeRuskin v. General Motors Corp. , Superior Court, judicial district of Litchfield, Docket No. 63833 (May 6, 1994, Walsh, J.). In the present action, however, the first precondition for an indemnification claim pursuant to General Statutes § 52-572o(e) has not been met; namely, the pleadings show that this action has not gone to judgment.

Therefore, the cross claim defendant's motion to strike the cross claim plaintiff's claim for indemnification/contribution is granted.

DAVID W. SKOLNICK, JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.