Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Connecticut Superior Court, 1999

Greenberg v. Allen, No. Cv 97-0159535-S (Apr. 1, 1999)

Greenberg v. Allen, No. Cv 97-0159535-S (Apr. 1, 1999)
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided April 1, 1999 · HICKEY, JUDGE.
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 4981
Greenberg v. Allen, No. Cv 97-0159535-S (Apr. 1, 1999)

Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION CT Page 4982
Since the defendants/counterclaim plaintiffs did not comply with practice book § 10-51, by not designating the particular count of the amended complaint to which each special defense is addressed, the motion to strike the special defenses to the amended complaint (#144) is hereby granted. However, at this time, the court will grant the defendants' request for leave to amend their answer, special defenses and counterclaims to the amended complaint (#147) in order to cure this technical defect.

So Ordered.

HICKEY, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.