Pitchell v. City of Hartford, No. Cv94-0538582s (May 9, 2000)

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

ARTICULATIONIn his motion for articulation the plaintiff requests this Court discuss two matters:

1) the date and the manner in which certain "orders" concerning the commencement of trial were rendered by the Court; and

2) the date and the maimer in which the parties were notified of each of the four orders.

I.As to the first requested issue, the Court notes that the orders were issued orally to counsel through certain court personnel. The plaintiff, of course, acknowledges receiving said orders and, indeed, confirmed said receipt in his attorney's memorandum to the defense attorney (see Exhibit A [November 30, 1999 Memorandum from Timothy Brignole, Esq. to Henry C. Ide, Esq.] attached to defendant's memorandum in opposition to plaintiffs motion for articulation and attached hereto; see also, transcript of January 24, 2000 hearing, comments of plaintiffs attorney pp. 3, 4, 5, 6, 10; plaintiffs motion for articulation dated February 23, 2000, pp. 3-4).

II.As to the second request, at the hearing on January 24, 2000, the Court discussed the oral notification by court personnel. As indicated, the plaintiff has clearly acknowledged the receipt of this information in his attorney's memorandum to Attorney Ide. (See Exhibit A attached hereto.)

Berger, J.

EXHIBIT "A"

BRIGNOLE AND BUSH, LLC ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW

TIMOTHY BRIGNOLE 73 WADSWORTH STREET REGIONAL OFFICE DAVID W. BUSH HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT 06106 13R HARTFORD AVENUE CT Page 5669 ----- (860) 527-9973 SUITE 2E JOHN C. LEWIS, III FAX (860) 527-5929 GRANBY, CONNECTICUT 06035 JEREMIAH D. MAHONEY (860) 653-5222 ALEXANDER APONTE

FAX MEMORANDUM

TO : Henry C. Ide, Esq. COMPANY : FAX NO. : 678-7506 FAXED FROM : Timothy Brignole, Esq. 11-30-99 DATE : November 30, 1999 NO. OF PAGES : 1 (Including cover sheet)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comments

Re: Pitchell v. City of Hartford, et al.

This office spoke to Jean at Caseflow who has indicated that based on the Plaintiff's Motion for Continuance of Trial, the Trial Management Conference on Friday, December 3, 1999, is off, as well as the Trial which is currently scheduled on December 9, 1999. The Judge indicated that Trial of this matter is to begin when the Donovan trial is concluded.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

The information contained in this fax message isintended only for the use of the designatedrecipient(s) named above. This message may be anattorney-client communication and as such, isprivileged and confidential. If the reader of thismessage is not the intended recipient, you are herebynotified that you have received this document in errorand that any review, dissemination, distribution orcopying of this message is strictly prohibited. If youhave received this communication in error, pleasenotify us immediately by telephone and return theoriginal to us by mail. Thank you.

If you have trouble receiving this transmittal, please call us by telephone.