Connecticut Superior Court, 2000

Package Masters v. Berry, No. Cv99 01725587 S (Mar. 7, 2000)

Package Masters v. Berry, No. Cv99 01725587 S (Mar. 7, 2000)
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided March 7, 2000 · D'ANDREA, JUDGE.
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 3265
Package Masters v. Berry, No. Cv99 01725587 S (Mar. 7, 2000)

Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

ORDER
The defendant, Craig Berry, has filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiff, Package Masters' complaint on the ground that the corporate plaintiff lacks capacity to sue pursuant to General Statutes § 33-921(a). "Pursuant to Practice Book § 160, [now § 10-46,] if a defendant intends to controvert the capacity of a corporate plaintiff to maintain a suit, the proper procedural vehicle to raise that issue is by way of a special CT Page 3266 defense in his answer." (Internal quotation marks omitted.)Coolidge-Fairfield Equities v. Somma, Superior Court, judicial district of Stamford/Norwalk at Stamford, Docket No. 159269 (March 17, 1998, Hickey, J.); see United States Trust Co. of NewYork v. DiGhello, 179 Conn. 246, 249, 425 A.2d 1287 (1979); see also Menley James Laboratories v. Mott's Super Markets, Inc.,26 Conn. Sup. 434, 434, 226 A.2d 400 (1966). Accordingly, the defendant's motion to dismiss the plaintiff's complaint is denied.

D'ANDREA, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.