Kenney v. Adams, No. Cv-00-0092832 (Oct. 25, 2000)
Opinion of the Court
Subsequently, Adams failed to make payments on the mortgage and also failed to pay property taxes due to the Town of Chester. In late 1999, the Town of Chester's tax collector noticed a public sale pursuant to §
By General Statutes §
On July 28th, Kenney brought this application for payment of moneys deposited in this court from the tax collector's sale. In an affidavit, Kenney has stated that Adams still owes $79,892.27 on the principal of the mortgage plus interest of $63,403.59 and late charges in the amount of $5,253.92. Kenney has also expended $4,302.30 in attorney's fees and $444.14 for the costs of collection.
Kenney filed the application on July 28, 2000. Because the tax collector deposited the moneys on July 10, 2000, Kenney has satisfied the ninety day filing requirement.
The final requirement that Kenney must satisfy is the notice to persons having an Kenney. In this matter, the record reveals that besides Kenney, only Adams, the former owner of the property, and the Town of Chester have any interest in the excess moneys. Kenney, accordingly, must be found to have given them proper notice.
A South Carolina sheriff served the attorney for Adams on August 18, 2000, and the attorney acknowledged receipt of a copy of the application. On October 4th, 2000, a sheriff in South Carolina also personally served Adams. Accordingly, Kenney has satisfied the notice provision in regard to Adams.
As for the Town of Chester, on September 21, 2000, a summons and a copy of the application were served upon John S. Bennet, an attorney authorized to accept service of process for the Town of Chester. Accordingly, Kenney has satisfied the notice provision in regard to the Town of Chester.
By statute, this court now has to use its equity powers to decide the disbursement of the excess funds. General Statutes §
By the court
CT Page 13089 Arena, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.