Statewide Grievance Committee v. Carella, No. Cv01-0096126 (Nov. 28, 2001)
Opinion of the Court
The respondent has acknowledged a violation of Section 8.4(4) of the Code of Professional Conduct. The court agrees that interference with the administration of justice was the result of the respondent's action. The court finds no other violations.
To his credit, the respondent took financial responsibility for any problems which might have been caused to third parties, and is truly remorseful for his conduct. The court believes that the proper discipline in this matter should be a private reprimand, and the respondent is ordered to appear, the office of the undersigned at 9:30 a.m., December 10, 2001 for imposition of that discipline.
ELAINE GORDON JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.