Connecticut Superior Court, 2002

Schain v. Schain, No. Fa 00-0156786 (Apr. 4, 2002)

Schain v. Schain, No. Fa 00-0156786 (Apr. 4, 2002)
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided April 4, 2002 · PICKARD, JUDGE.
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 4200
Schain v. Schain, No. Fa 00-0156786 (Apr. 4, 2002)

Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO REARGUE/ARTICULATION
1. The motion to reargue under Section 11-11 of the Practice Book is not timely. Therefore, it is denied.

2. The motion for articulation under Section 63-1 of the Practice Book is denied because no appeal was taken as required under that section.

____________________ John W. Pickard, J. CT Page 4201

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.