Blue Ridge Insurance Co. v. Bolivar, No. Cv00 037 83 10 (May 29, 2002)
Opinion of the Court
At the time of the fire, Infante (Administrator and PPA) was in a tenant relationship to Bolivar and Moreau. The plaintiff asserts that there is no coverage in place for claims by Infante against Bolivar and Moreau because the premises were not a "residential premises" within the policy definitions.
In the instant matter no responsive papers have been filed, the plaintiff has filed extensive documentation supporting its entitlement to summary judgment.
The defendants Bolivar and Moreau did not reside at the effected premises on the date in questions.
The policy excludes from coverage all liability of the insureds for personal injuries arising out of premises that are not as insured location.
The policy defines an insured location at page 2, paragraph 7. None of the definitions are effective in this case.
The policy provides for exclusions for bodily injury claims in the instant set of factual circumstances. See page 23, Exclusions.
The plaintiff has neither a duty to defend nor any duty to indemnify said defendant Moreau for any of the claimed damages resulting from the fire at 1300-1304 Howard Avenue, Bridgeport, CT on November 14, 1996 under plaintiffs policy H 0 167239. CT Page 6766
___________________ DANIEL E. BRENNAN, JR., J.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.