Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1791

State v. Bennet

State v. Bennet
Supreme Court of Connecticut · Decided January 15, 1791
1 Root 249

State v. Bennet

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

A witness being entitled to the premium is a consequential matter, and from the necessity of the case will *250not exclude Mm, although it lessens the weight of his testimony; hut where a witness has acted so villainous a part as Collins by traducing a young lad into a crime, in order to betray him, from the sordid motive of obtaining the premium, discovers such depravity of heart, as would render it dangerous for a court of- justice, to admit him to testify — he was therefore rejected.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.