Penfield v. Norton
Penfield v. Norton
1 Root 345
Penfield v. Norton
Opinion of the Court
Manifest error. That the child was horn, is a necessary averment in a prosecution of this nature, before trial. And as the complaint in such cases is often commenced before the child is horn, and the man taken and bound to answer before the County Court upon it, yet the court will continue the cause until the child is horn, and then allow the complainant to add that fact by way of supplement to her
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.