Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1792

Payne v. Payne

Payne v. Payne
Supreme Court of Connecticut · Decided January 15, 1792
1 Root 367

Payne v. Payne

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

This cannot be allowed; for according to the rules of chancery, a man cannot introduce himself to be a witness in his own favor. The plaintiff in his answer to the bill, might appeal to the defendant’s conscience and so have him introduced. See Livingston v. Bird, Litchfield August 1791.

The defendant then moved for liberty to withdraw his bill and plead the statute in avoidance of the whole note; which was allowed by the court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.