Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1793

Abel v. Forgue

Abel v. Forgue
Supreme Court of Connecticut · Decided January 15, 1793
1 Root 502
Abel v. Forgue

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The motion in arrest is insufficient, and the defendant must have judgment. The plaintiff’s consenting to the release of said Jonathan from imprisonment on said execution was a discharge of said Erancis. Eor where two are jointly charged and imprisoned on an execution, the creditor’s-consenting to the release of one, is a discharge of both.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.