Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1807

State v. Woodruff

Supreme Court of Connecticut · Decided July 1, 1807

2 Day 504

Counsel

Samuel Woodhuff, Plaintiff in error ; The State ot Connecticut, Defendant in error., Daggett, and Gould, for the plaintiff in error., Huntington, (of Middletown,) for the defendant, in error,

Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

unanimously, the judgment was reversed, on the ground, that the qualification required by statute is the having a freehold estate actually rated in the common list at nine dollars ;■ and that the having such estate rateable in the list at that sum is not sufficient.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.