Rand v. The Proprietors of the Upper Locks & Canals on Connecticut River
Rand v. The Proprietors of the Upper Locks & Canals on Connecticut River
3 Day 441
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Kelley v. Mississippi Central R. (United States Circuit Courts 1880)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In this case, the writ and process has been no otherwise served than by leaving a copy thereof at the usual place of abode of James Bull, oí Hartford, in Connecticut, who is described therein as one of the principal proprietors, and one of the directors of the corporate body.
Serving a summons upon any private individual of a corporation is not due and legal notice to the corporate body.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.