Lung's case
Cases that cite this one
23 later published cases cite this decision.
- State v. Guay (Connecticut Superior Court 1963)
- Honulik v. Town of Greenwich (Conn. 2009)
- Kinsella v. Jaekle (Conn. 1984)
- State v. Clemente (Conn. 1974)
- State v. Moynahan (Conn. 1973)
- State v. Menillo (Conn. 1970)
- State v. Peeler (Conn. 2016)
- State v. Peeler (Conn. 2016)
- State v. Santiago (Conn. 2015)
- Moore v. Ganim (Conn. 1995)
- State v. Morrill (Conn. 1985)
- State v. Couture (Conn. 1984)
- State v. Avcollie (Conn. 1982)
- State v. Canady (Conn. 1982)
- James L. Cobbs v. Carl Robinson, Warden, Connecticut State Prison (2d Cir. 1976)
- State v. Reinosa (Connecticut Superior Court 1970)
- McBrien v. Warden (Conn. 1966)
- State v. Stallings (Conn. 1966)
- State v. Stallings (Connecticut Superior Court 1964)
- State v. Kemp (Conn. 1939)
- State v. Hayes (Connecticut Superior Court 1938)
- Blodgett v. Cosgrove (Conn. 1933)
- United States v. Terry (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 1889)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Directions to the Grand-Jury.
YOU will retire to some convenient apartment to be provided for you by the sheriff. You will choose some one of your number to be your foreman. The attorney for the state will lay before you such bills as he may think proper, and refer you to the witnesses to support them. You will cause the prisoner and the witnesses to come before you. You will admit no counsel on the part of the state, or of the prisoner. You will permit the prisoner to put any proper questions to the witnesses, but not to call any witnesses on his part. You will admit no spectators to be present during your enquiries and deliberations. At least twelve of your number must be agreed to find a bill. Such bills as you find supported by the evidence you will return into court endorsed by your foreman—A true bill. Such bills as you find not supported by the evidence you will return in like manner indorsed by your foreman—Not a true bill.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.