Witter v. Mott
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Whitehill v. Halbing (Conn. 1922)
- In re the Estate of Miller (New York Surrogate's Court 1906)
- Thompson v. Royall (Va. 1934)
- Derr v. Derr (Kan. 1927)
- In re the Application for the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Parsons (New York Surrogate's Court 1922)
- Howard v. Hunter (Ga. 1902)
- Billington v. Jones (Tenn. 1901)
- Carey v. Baughn (Iowa 1873)
- Delafield v. Parish (New York Surrogate's Court 1857)
- Card v. Grinman (Conn. 1823)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The declaration subscribed by the testator on the back of his will — “ This will is invalid,” — is an express revocation of ¡1. It is the same as if he had said, this will is revoked. The reason which be has given cannot change the nature of the act. If he had intended solely to vacate the legacy to his wife, he might have said it in so many words : and it cannot be known but that the agreement made that his wife should have no claim on his estate after
It is not necessary that the revocation of a will should be attested by three witnesses. It is sufficient to be in writing; and then it may be proved like any* other instrument.
When a will has been revoked in due form, by a written declaration, it cannot be set up, or republished, by parol.
I am of opinion that the judgment be reversed.
Judgment reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.