Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1856

State v. Powers

Supreme Court of Connecticut · Decided March 15, 1856 · Ellsworth

25 Conn. 48

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Demarce (Iowa 1946)
State v. McGee (Conn. 1914)
State v. Kendig (Iowa 1907)
State v. Simpson (Me. 1897)
Territory v. Scott (Supreme Court of Dakota 1880)
Buffalo Pipe Line Co. v. N. Y., Lake Erie & Western R. R. Co. (New York Supreme Court 1880)
Adams v. Way (Conn. 1866)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Ellsworth, J.

We think there is no force in the objection, that the grand-juror who prosecuted, and the justice who tried the defendant, had no jurisdiction of this complaint. It is said that the complaint does not state that the offence was committed within the county of New London. *51Stonington is the place named in the complaint, and the time of committing the offence is named; and although the county is not named, we can judicially take notice of that, which is sufficient. The county and the towns within it are geographical divisions of the state which courts may always take notice of.

The other objection, the want of a negation in the information, that the defendant’s case comes within the excepted cases in the statute,' we have decided is not well taken, in the case of the State v. John Miller, 24 Conn. R., 522.

Our advice to the superior court is, that the complaint is sufficient.

In this opinion the other judges, Storrs and Hinman, concurred.

Complaint sufficient.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.