Pellegrino Di Leo v. Filippo Catanzaro

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Pellegrino Di Leo v. Filippo Catanzaro, 115 A. 925 (Conn. 1921)
96 Conn. 725; 1921 Conn. LEXIS 141
PER CURIAM.

Pellegrino Di Leo v. Filippo Catanzaro

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Examination of the evidence shows that the motion to correct the finding is almost in its entirety wholly without merit; the rest of the motion is without significance and, if granted, could not affect the questions of law involved in the appeal. Unless the finding be corrected the claimed errors of law, as the appellant concedes, cannot be successfully pursued.

There is no error.

Reference

Full Case Name
Pellegrino Di Leo, Administrator, vs. Filippo Catanzaro Et Al.
Status
Published