Grolock v. Haefenfeldtz
Grolock v. Haefenfeldtz
122 A. 925; 99 Conn. 732; 1923 Conn. LEXIS 150
Grolock v. Haefenfeldtz
Opinion of the Court
The errors assigned are all predicated upon corrections of the finding. We have duly considered the evidence and cannot hold that the court found facts’ or failed to find facts, essential to the judgment, incorrectly. The conclusions of the trial court could have been reasonably reached upon the evidence and the inferences drawn from it.
There is no error.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.