Grolock v. Haefenfeldtz

Supreme Court of Connecticut November 7, 1923

Grolock v. Haefenfeldtz, 122 A. 925 (Conn. 1923)

99 Conn. 732; 1923 Conn. LEXIS 150

PER CURIAM.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The errors assigned are all predicated upon corrections of the finding. We have duly considered the evidence and cannot hold that the court found facts’ or failed to find facts, essential to the judgment, incorrectly. The conclusions of the trial court could have been reasonably reached upon the evidence and the inferences drawn from it.

There is no error.

Reference

Full Case Name: Julius Grolock, Administrator, Et Al. vs. Emil Haefenfeldtz Et Als.
Status: Published