Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1926

Dixon v. Gallon

Supreme Court of Connecticut · Decided May 7, 1926 · Wheeler, Curtis, Maltbie, Haines, Hinman

133 A. 213; 104 Conn. 740; 1926 Conn. LEXIS 154

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. Mulvey (Conn. App. Ct. 1965)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

*741 Per Curiam.

The errors assigned in the appeal are from rulings on evidence and from the charge as made. Since neither appellant, nor appellee, filed a statement of what each offered evidence to prove and claimed to have proved, the trial court should have either required the parties to comply with the rules, or have refused to make a finding. It is impossible for us to pass upon either the rulings on evidence or the parts of the charge complained of without having before us a statement of the facts which each party claimed to have proved and offered evidence to prove.

The appeal is dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.