Zimmerman v. Wallman

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Zimmerman v. Wallman, 156 Conn. 637 (Conn. 1968)
244 A.2d 371

Zimmerman v. Wallman

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

On the evidence presented, the jury could reasonably find that the damages awarded constituted fair, just and reasonable com*638pensation for the injuries the named plaintiff sustained. Accordingly, there was no error in the refusal of the court to set the verdict aside. Schaller v. Roadside Inn, Inc., 154 Conn. 61, 68, 221 A.2d 263; Lopez v. Price, 145 Conn. 560, 564, 569, 145 A.2d 127.

There is no error.

Reference

Full Case Name
Edna M. Zimmerman v. Betty P. Wallman
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published