Parent v. St. Pierre

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Parent v. St. Pierre, 161 Conn. 565 (Conn. 1971)
287 A.2d 743

Parent v. St. Pierre

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

On the evidence presented, the jury could reasonably have found that the damages awarded constituted fair, just and reasonable compensation for the injuries the plaintiff Rowena Parent sustained. Accordingly, there was no error in the refusal of the court to set the verdict aside. Zimmerman v. Wallman, 156 Conn. 637, 244 A.2d 371.

There is no error.

Reference

Full Case Name
Martin Parent v. Eugene L. St. Pierre
Status
Published