Parent v. St. Pierre
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Parent v. St. Pierre, 161 Conn. 565 (Conn. 1971)
287 A.2d 743
Parent v. St. Pierre
Opinion of the Court
On the evidence presented, the jury could reasonably have found that the damages awarded constituted fair, just and reasonable compensation for the injuries the plaintiff Rowena Parent sustained. Accordingly, there was no error in the refusal of the court to set the verdict aside. Zimmerman v. Wallman, 156 Conn. 637, 244 A.2d 371.
There is no error.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Martin Parent v. Eugene L. St. Pierre
- Status
- Published