This case involves an appeal from a denial, allegedly without a hearing, of a motion for accelerated rehabilitation. Since the nonappealability of this ruling is governed by our decisions in State v. Parker, 194 Conn. 650, 485 A.2d 139 (1984), and State v. Spendolini, 189 Conn. 92, 454 A.2d 720 (1983), no further explication is necessary.

Appeal dismissed.

In this opinion Peters, C. J., Parskey, Shea and Dannehy, Js., concurred.

dissenting. Because I adhere to the analysis articulated by the dissent in State v. Spendolini, 189 Conn. 92, 100-101, 456 A.2d 720 (1983) (appeal from denial of defendant’s motion to enter accelerated rehabilitation program), I dissent.