Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1989

State v. Vallas

Supreme Court of Connecticut · Decided January 12, 1989

210 Conn. 803; 554 A.2d 744; 1989 Conn. LEXIS 40

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. Calash (Conn. 1989)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 16 Conn. App. 245, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court err in affirming the defendant’s conviction and holding that the wiretap panel’s *804failure to make a written determination of probable cause, pursuant to General Statutes §§ 54-41d (7) and 51-41e, that a special need existed to intercept wire communications over a public telephone was not reversible error?”

William G. Dow III, in support of the petition. Harry Weller, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided January 12, 1989

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.