State v. Vallas

Supreme Court of Connecticut
State v. Vallas, 210 Conn. 803 (Conn. 1989)
554 A.2d 744; 1989 Conn. LEXIS 40

State v. Vallas

Opinion of the Court

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 16 Conn. App. 245, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court err in affirming the defendant’s conviction and holding that the wiretap panel’s *804failure to make a written determination of probable cause, pursuant to General Statutes §§ 54-41d (7) and 51-41e, that a special need existed to intercept wire communications over a public telephone was not reversible error?”

William G. Dow III, in support of the petition. Harry Weller, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided January 12, 1989

Reference

Full Case Name
State of Connecticut v. Elliott G. Vallas
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published