Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1992

Francoline v. Klatt

Francoline v. Klatt
Supreme Court of Connecticut · Decided February 14, 1992
221 Conn. 913; 603 A.2d 404; 1992 Conn. LEXIS 77

Francoline v. Klatt

Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 26 Conn. App. 203, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the trial court’s judgment that the defendant had not proven *914a valid claim under General Statutes §§ 42-110a through 42-110g, the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act?”

Decided February 14, 1992 Ann M. Siczewicz, in support of the petition. Robert J. Reeve, in opposition.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑