Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1992

State v. Indrisano

Supreme Court of Connecticut · Decided October 30, 1992

224 Conn. 914; 617 A.2d 168; 1992 Conn. LEXIS 401

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. Indrisano (Conn. 1994)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 283 (AC 10659), is granted, limited to the following questions:

“1. Was the Appellate Court correct in concluding that the record was insufficient, pursuant to State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233 (1989), to permit adequate appellate review of the defendant’s claims that, on its face and as applied, General Statutes § 53a-182 was void for vagueness under the state and federal constitutions?

“2. Is General Statutes § 53a-182 void for vagueness on its face and as applied to this case, under the state and federal constitutions?”

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.