Amore v. Frankel

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Amore v. Frankel, 225 Conn. 904 (Conn. 1993)
621 A.2d 286; 1993 Conn. LEXIS 76

Amore v. Frankel

Opinion of the Court

The defendant commissioner’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 565 (AC 10677), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Does the duty of the commissioner of transportation to maintain highways, bridges and sidewalks under General Statutes § 13a-144 extend to driveways?
*905Decided February 11, 1993 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14689. Michael 0 ’Sullivan, in support of the petition. Robert J. Enright, in opposition.
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the trial court’s dismissal of this action on the basis that the complaint stated a cause of action under General Statutes § 13a-144, notwithstanding the affidavits of the defendant indicating that the defendant had no duty to keep the area in question in repair?”

Reference

Full Case Name
Alan Amore v. Emil Frankel, Commissioner of Transportation
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published