Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1996

State v. Corbeil

Supreme Court of Connecticut · Decided May 28, 1996 · SC 15427

237 Conn. 919; 676 A.2d 1374; 1996 Conn. LEXIS 225

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. Nalewajk (Conn. App. Ct. 2019)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 41 Conn. App. 7 (AC 13990), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*920The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15427. Todd Edgington, assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Ronald G. Weller, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided May 28, 1996*

“Under the state constitution, if initial statements made by a defendant are excluded only because of a Miranda violation, and not because they were coerced, must the subsequent post-Miranda statements be excluded in the absence of a showing of a break in the stream of events?”

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.