Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1996

Covelli v. Commissioner of Revenue Services

Supreme Court of Connecticut · Decided November 12, 1996 · Berdon, Katz, Whom

239 Conn. 257; 683 A.2d 737; 1996 Conn. LEXIS 435

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision.

Steven Waters v. Reagan Farr, Commissioner of Revenue for the State of Tennessee (Tenn. 2009)
Jensen v. Bouker (District Court, D. Kansas 2000)
Covelli v. Gavin, No. Cv 98 0492271s (Jan. 13, 2000) (Connecticut Superior Court 2000)
Commissioner of Revenue v. Mullins (Mass. 1998)
State of Tennessee v. John Shields (Tenn. Crim. App. 2008)
Vick v. Williams (4th Cir. 2000)
Desimone v. State (Nev. 2000)
Vick v. Williams (4th Cir. 2000)
State v. Price (S.C. 1998)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before us on remand from the United States Supreme Court. We previously considered it in Covelli v. Commissioner of Revenue Services, 235 Conn. 539, 668 A.2d 699 (1995). On the plaintiffs petition for a writ of certiorari, the United States Supreme Court vacated our previous judgment; Covelli v. Crystal, U.S. , 116 S. Ct. 2577, 135 L. Ed. 2d 1092 (1996); and ordered us to reconsider it in light of United States v. Ursery, 518 U.S. 267, 116 S. Ct. 2135, 135 L. Ed. 2d 549 (1996). Having reconsidered, we affirm our prior judgment.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case is remanded to that court for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in Covelli v. Commissioner of Revenue Services, supra, 235 Conn. 539.

In this opinion CALLAHAN, C. J., and BORDEN, NORCOTT, PALMER and PETERS, Js., concurred.

Dissenting Opinion

KATZ, J., with whom, BERDON, J.,

joins, dissenting. The United States Supreme Court, in Covelli v. Crystal, *259U.S. , 116 S. Ct. 2577, 135 L. Ed. 2d 1092 (1996), vacated the judgment of this court in Covelli v. Commissioner of Revenue Services, 235 Conn. 539, 668 A.2d 699 (1995), and remanded the case for our reconsideration. I disagree with the majority that our prior judgment should be affirmed, and I take this opportunity to restate my opinion that the double jeopardy clause of the fifth amendment to the United States constitution was violated when the plaintiff, following his judgment of conviction for possession of illicit drugs, was assessed a tax pursuant to Connecticut’s Marijuana and Controlled Substances Tax Act, General Statutes §§ 12-650 through 12-660.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.