Salaman v. City of Waterbury
Salaman v. City of Waterbury
240 Conn. 921; 692 A.2d 816; 1997 Conn. LEXIS 109
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Salaman v. City of Waterbury (Conn. 1998)
- Gonzalez v. City of Waterbury, No. Cv97-0143396 S (Jul. 17, 1998) (Connecticut Superior Court 1998)
- Finnegan v. Ramsdell, No. Cv 96-0475869s (Jul. 30, 1998) (Connecticut Superior Court 1998)
- Perkins v. Stop Shop Companies, No. Cv 97 0568241s (Jul. 15, 1998) (Connecticut Superior Court 1998)
- Parasco v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. (Conn. App. Ct. 1998)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 44 Conn. App. 211 (AC 14709), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court had improperly set aside the verdict rendered in favor of the plaintiff because the plaintiff had failed to establish that (1) the city owed a duty to the plaintiffs decedent and (2) that the city had breached any such duty?
“2. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court had granted the city’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on a ground that was not first raised in the city’s motion for directed verdict?”
BERDON, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.