Doyle v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Doyle v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance, 245 Conn. 903 (Conn. 1998)
719 A.2d 1163; 1998 Conn. LEXIS 207

Doyle v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance

Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 902 (AC 17006), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the tortfeasor’s vehicle is not underinsured when the tort-feasor has a $100,000 liability policy and the plaintiff has a $100,000/$300,000 split limit uninsured motorist policy in circumstances where, due to the existence of multiple claimants, the plaintiffs recovery under the tortfeasor’s policy is less than $100,000?”

*904The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15939. Bernard, Pellegrino, in support of the petition. Karen T. Gerber, in opposition. Decided May 15, 1998

Reference

Full Case Name
SEAN DOYLE v. METROPOLITAN PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published