Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1998

Doyle v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of Connecticut · Decided May 15, 1998

245 Conn. 903; 719 A.2d 1163; 1998 Conn. LEXIS 207

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Doyle v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance (Conn. 1999)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 902 (AC 17006), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the tortfeasor’s vehicle is not underinsured when the tort-feasor has a $100,000 liability policy and the plaintiff has a $100,000/$300,000 split limit uninsured motorist policy in circumstances where, due to the existence of multiple claimants, the plaintiffs recovery under the tortfeasor’s policy is less than $100,000?”

*904The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15939. Bernard, Pellegrino, in support of the petition. Karen T. Gerber, in opposition. Decided May 15, 1998

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.