The motion by the defendant Sullivan Asociates for reargument or reargument en banc of this court’s decision in Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Sullivan Associates, 250 Conn. 763, 739 A.2d 238 (1999), is denied.

dissenting. I dissent from the vote denying reargument in this case for the reasons stated in my dissent published in Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Sullivan Associates, 250 Conn. 763, 739 A.2d 238 (1999). I wish to note that the vote on this motion making a vast change in the law of property and landlord and tenant was five to four.