Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.

Supreme Court of Connecticut September 18, 2003

Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp., 266 Conn. 907 (Conn. 2003)

832 A.2d 72; 2003 Conn. LEXIS 399

Opinion of the Court

The petition by the Hartford Courant Company for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 77 Conn. App. 690 (AC 23014/AC 23015/AC 23016/AC 23017/AC 23069/AC 23078/AC 23079/AC 23161), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly granted the application to create a new file?”

NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Ralph G. Elliot, in support of the petition. John B. Farley, Joseph T. Sweeney, Ralph W. Johnson III, James V. Somers, James F. Stapleton, John F. Conway and W. Glen Pierson, in opposition. Decided September 18, 2003

Reference

Full Case Name: GEORGE ROSADO v. BRIDGEPORT ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESAN CORPORATION J. KNECHT v. BRIDGEPORT ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESAN CORPORATION IN RE APPLICATION OF NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY FOR ORDER VACATING PROTECTIVE ORDERS AND REQUIRING FILING OF DISCOVERY MATERIALS
Cited By: 2 cases
Status: Published