Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2003

Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.

Supreme Court of Connecticut · Decided September 18, 2003

266 Conn. 907; 832 A.2d 72; 2003 Conn. LEXIS 399

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Hartford Courant Co. v. Pellegrino (United States District Court for the District of Connecticut 2003)
Ingels v. Saldana (Conn. App. Ct. 2007)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

The petition by the Hartford Courant Company for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 77 Conn. App. 690 (AC 23014/AC 23015/AC 23016/AC 23017/AC 23069/AC 23078/AC 23079/AC 23161), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly granted the application to create a new file?”

NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Ralph G. Elliot, in support of the petition. John B. Farley, Joseph T. Sweeney, Ralph W. Johnson III, James V. Somers, James F. Stapleton, John F. Conway and W. Glen Pierson, in opposition. Decided September 18, 2003

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.