Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2003

Ankerman v. Mancuso

Ankerman v. Mancuso
Supreme Court of Connecticut · Decided November 4, 2003
266 Conn. 925; 835 A.2d 471; 2003 Conn. LEXIS 513

Ankerman v. Mancuso

Opinion of the Court

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 79 Conn. App. 480 (AC 23369), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*926The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17086. James Colin Mulholland, in support of the petition. William L. Ankerman, pro se, in opposition. Decided November 4, 2003
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly refused to enforce a secondary mortgage loan transaction made by an attorney with a client despite its finding that the transaction violated the public policy underlying rule 1.8 (j) of the Rules of Professional Conduct?”

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.