Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2004

State v. Hardy

State v. Hardy
Supreme Court of Connecticut · Decided December 8, 2004
863 A.2d 699; 272 Conn. 906; 2004 Conn. LEXIS 566 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Hardy

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 85 Conn. App. 708 (AC 23960), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Does a ‘firearm’ as defined in General Statutes § 53a-3 (19) require that a shot be discharged by gunpowder?
“2. Does a ‘deadly weapon’ as defined in General Statutes § 53a-3 (6) require that a shot be discharged by gunpowder?”
*907 Decided December 8, 2004 Marjorie Allen Dauster, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑