Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2004

State v. Hardy

Supreme Court of Connecticut · Decided December 8, 2004

863 A.2d 699; 272 Conn. 906; 2004 Conn. LEXIS 566 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Hardy (Conn. 2006)
State v. Grant (Conn. 2009)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 85 Conn. App. 708 (AC 23960), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Does a ‘firearm’ as defined in General Statutes § 53a-3 (19) require that a shot be discharged by gunpowder?

“2. Does a ‘deadly weapon’ as defined in General Statutes § 53a-3 (6) require that a shot be discharged by gunpowder?”

*907 Decided December 8, 2004 Marjorie Allen Dauster, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.