Murphy v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF CITY OF STAMFORD
Murphy v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF CITY OF STAMFORD
870 A.2d 1080; 273 Conn. 910
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Murphy v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF CITY OF STAMFORD
Opinion
Karen A. MURPHY et al.
v.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF the CITY OF STAMFORD et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Karen A. Murphy, pro se, and Kathleen A. Murphy, pro se, in support of the petition.
John W. Mullin, assistant corporation counsel, in opposition.
The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 86 Conn.App. 147, 860 A.2d 764 (2004), is denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.