Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2005

Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. Vaszil

Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. Vaszil
Supreme Court of Connecticut · Decided September 12, 2005
275 Conn. 911; 882 A.2d 673
Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. Vaszil

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

The petition by the defendants Brian Vaszil and Robert Vaszil for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 89 Conn. App. 482 (AC 25437), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff was entitled to subrogation for the fire loss under the circumstances of this case?”

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.