Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2006

Vine v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF TOWN OF NORTH BRANFORD

Supreme Court of Connecticut · Decided March 2, 2006 · Katz

895 A.2d 794; 277 Conn. 918; 2006 Conn. LEXIS 82 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Vine v. Zoning Board of Appeals (Conn. 2007)
Vine v. Zoning Board of Appeals (Conn. App. Ct. 2007)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

The petition by the named defendant for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 93 Conn. App. 1 (AC 25837), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the variance granted by the named defendant, the zoning board of appeals of the town of North Branford, was improper because the hardship was merely financial?”

KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.