Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2006

Longley v. State Employees Retirement Commission

Longley v. State Employees Retirement Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut · Decided March 2, 2006
277 Conn. 914; 895 A.2d 789; 2006 Conn. LEXIS 74

Longley v. State Employees Retirement Commission

Opinion of the Court

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 92 Conn. App. 712 (AC 26186), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, in the calculation of retirement income, pursuant to the State Employees Retirement Act, accrued vacation time and longevity payments should be counted as additions to ‘base salary’?”

Daniel J. Klau, Richard F. Wareing and Joseph J. Chambers, in support of the petition. Donald, M. Longley, pro se, and Richard K. Greenberg, pro se, in opposition. Decided March 2, 2006

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.