Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2008

State v. Tunick

State v. Tunick
Supreme Court of Connecticut · Decided October 30, 2008 · Norcott
959 A.2d 1011; 289 Conn. 943 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
State v. Tunick

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

959 A.2d 1011 (2008)
289 Conn. 943

STATE of Connecticut
v.
Stephen TUNICK.

No. 18262.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided October 30, 2008.

Richard Emanuel, New Haven, in support of the petition.

Ronald G. Weller, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 109 Conn.App. 611, 952 A.2d 103 (2008), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court improperly affirm the defendant's conviction, without first remanding the case to the trial court for a hearing on the question of whether the trial judge had actively participated in pretrial negotiations?"

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18262.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.